Pelley Applies Voice of Reason Over Li Haotong Penalty
WHISPER it but it looks like common sense is about to break on the European Tour. After another weekend in which a tour pro fell foul of new rules that were meant to make life easier for everybody who plays golf, chief executive Keith Pelley has issued a statement in which he says that he believes a two-shot penalty imposed on Li Haotong at the Dubai Desert Classic was unfair.
The Chinese golfer was in position to finish third and thought that he had done so until he walked off the 72nd green and was informed that he was being penalised two shots. The reason? His caddie was standing directly behind him as he took his stance on the green. Li, who won the event last year with a tournament record score of 23-under, thought that he made made a birdie but it turned out to be a six and it dropped him from third to 12th. He was assessed a two-stroke penalty after officials determined that Li’s caddie was on a direct line behind the ball when the golfer took his stance on the green. Somewhat ludicrously, he would have avoided the penalty had he backed off and taken his stance again. According to the USGA and R&A one of the new Rules of Golf states that “the player’s caddie must not deliberately stand on or close to an extension of the line of play behind the ball for any reason” once the player begins taking a stance until the stroke is completed. However, no penalty is given out if the caddie does so by accident rather than as trying to help out the player.
The rule was changed in order to prevent caddies from helping their players with their stance. While a caddie is still allowed to give advice on the line of play or how the shot should be played, the powers-that-be say that “the ability to line up one’s feet and body accurately to a target line is a fundamental skill of the game for which the player alone should be responsible.”
The USGA and R&A also say that allowing a caddie to stand behind a player and help with their stance “undermines the player’s need to use his or her own alignment skills and judgment.” It has to be said that Li’s caddie clearly played no part in helping his player to line up the putt. But the rule are the rules!
Nevertheless, the two-shot penalty dropped Li nine spots from third to 12th place. A third-place finish would have earned Li £115,000. Instead, his 12th-place finish gave Li £39,000, so it turned out to be an expensive mistake - and one that he won’t be making again. Li finished the round at 1-over 73 and at 14-under for the tournament. To make matters worse, his tournament scoring record was broken by Bryson DeChambeau, who won with a score of 264, 24 under par, as he recorded his first victory on the European Tour.
The decision infuriated a number of Li’s fellow professionals, who described it as ludicrous. Among the most vocal was Eddie Pepperell.
Pelley issued a statement in which he said: “There has been much discussion and comment over the past 24 hours on the two-shot penalty given to Li Haotong on the 18th green at the Dubai Desert Classic. Let me state that under the new rules of golf the decision made by our referees was correct, under the strict wording of the rules. It is my strong belief, however, that the fact there is no discretion available to our referees when implementing such rulings as this is wrong and should be addressed immediately.
“Everyone I have spoken to about this believes, as I do, that there was no malice or intent from Li Haotong, nor did he gain any advantage from his or his caddie’s actions. Therefore, the subsequent two-shot penalty, which moved him from a tie for third to a tie for 12th was grossly unfair in my opinion. In an era where we are striving to improve all aspects of golf, we need to be careful and find the proper balance between maintaining the integrity of the game and promoting its global appeal. I have spoken to R&A chief executive Martin Slumbers to voice my opposition to the fact that there is no discretion available to our referees in relation to this ruling and I will be making additional representation to the R&A in the near future to discuss the matter further.”
The R&A, in turn, have responded with a statement of their own, Martin Slumbers reiterating that "there is no discretionary element to the rule."
With regards to Pelley, it seems, we have somebody in a position of power who seems to understand how ludicrous golf can make itself look at times. Watch this space, as there is sure to be more on this continually evolving topic.
Be part of the action with a selection of unique golf tournament experiences, from playing in a pro-am with the stars to watching the action at golf’s most illustrious events. Whether it’s the Masters or The Open, The Ryder Cup or WM Phoenix Open, build your own bespoke package with the experts at Golfbreaks.com.
What do you think? leave your comments below (Comments)