Is this a step too far?
Forum > Tour Talk |
| Is this a step too far? |
![]() Adam Smith[FORUM MODERATOR]Handicap : 7 Posted : Mon 23rd Aug 2010 10:07 |
First off, Congratulations to Arjun Atwal who became the first Indian to win on the PGA Tour. I didn't see it myself but I came across this on another website this morning: "He even had the courage to blast his approach to the last in the hope of hitting the spectators' tent that was positioned behind the green in order to get a favourable drop shot. What does everyone think? Good thinking? Against the rules of the game????
|
![]() Colin CooteHandicap : 20.1 Reply : Mon 23rd Aug 2010 10:41 |
fantastic forward thinking. he definitely played to win good luck to him |
![]() John PettittHandicap : 18 Reply : Mon 23rd Aug 2010 10:46 |
I don't think for one moment that he did that on purpose, after all he was trying to win the tournament so would rather have been on the green and would have played for the green. My opinion is that he had an adrenaline rush and that is what caused him to go through the green, and he was fortunate that the dropping zone was in a favourable position. He still had to hole a seven footer, which is not guaranteed. |
![]() Stevie OdonnellHandicap : 21.2 Reply : Mon 30th Aug 2010 11:13 |
| watched it on sky and he deff played for the drop all credit to him for using the rules to his advantage |
![]() Loud Mouth b.a.Handicap : Reply : Mon 30th Aug 2010 11:23 |
"Different mountain top, different God." (Quotation from the late Sir Arthur John Gielgud, playing Master Of Trinity College in 'Chariots of Fire' ). |
| Last edit : Mon 30th Aug 2010 11:30 |
![]() Russell Middleton[FORUM MODERATOR]Handicap : 14.7 Reply : Mon 30th Aug 2010 13:31 |
If he deliverately played to hit the spectator tent then that is not golf. Didn't see the incident myself so I cannot say if he meant it or not. Russ |
![]() Alan GunnigleHandicap : 9.7 Reply : Mon 30th Aug 2010 19:02 |
| if it's not illegal, then it's legal, well done |
![]() Gary AllenHandicap : 19.1 Reply : Mon 30th Aug 2010 19:42 |
I think Tiger did it once at Dubia. 2nd shot to the last over water,he took plenty off club hit into the stand so he could get a drop from drop zone .nobody complained then. |
![]() Loud Mouth b.a.Handicap : Reply : Mon 30th Aug 2010 19:51 |
Totally right - if something is not illegal then it's legal but such is not the point. Rules relating to relief were devised with a view to granting golfers relief when they inadvertently found themselves.....wherever. To perversely deliberately seek relief is completely contrary to the spirit of the game.
|
![]() Alan GunnigleHandicap : 9.7 Reply : Mon 30th Aug 2010 21:00 |
| sanders, a rule is a rule, it's there to cover a certain situation, in this case if you are against the tent, he was and got the correct relief |
![]() Loud Mouth b.a.Handicap : Reply : Mon 30th Aug 2010 21:21 |
Alan, Within the confines of the logic used you are obviously correct. Unfortunately when rules set up to protect in one situation are perversely used in order to take advantage they arguably require amendment. It is not only sad that such possible behaviour requires such, but if the relief rule were to be tightened such creates an administrative problem centering on judging a player's intent. If today's golfers were all gentlemen then relief principles which have stood the test of time would not now possibly require 'putting under the microscope.' There is of course the possible line of argument that officials do not privately take umbridge at the principle of relief being deliberately targeted. But I can't imagine that being the case for a moment.
|
| Last edit : Mon 30th Aug 2010 21:22 |
![]() Alan GunnigleHandicap : 9.7 Reply : Mon 30th Aug 2010 21:41 |
| so if he said it was his intention to play it that way what then, would he have to play the ball whilst it rests against a tent? |
![]() Loud Mouth b.a.Handicap : Reply : Mon 30th Aug 2010 22:01 |
Alan, You have already answered your question earlier insofar as the way the rules now stand one can deliberately chase relief. Everything you say on a strict interpretation of the current rules is absolutely correct. I can't answer what would be the case in the future. It would depend on how the rules were amended. I personally doubt that they will be amended as it would create an impossible to determine situation based on a player's intent. It matters little, but I feel that if one deliberately hits a ball into a tent then "Yes" one should have to play the ball from where it lies. But, such is possibly for the future and is certainly not the case now. Anyway Alan, this has been a good friendly debate. Thanks. |
![]() Alan GunnigleHandicap : 9.7 Reply : Mon 30th Aug 2010 22:33 |
| hey sanders, can't argue that it may be ungentlemanly (sp) conduct, but like you say how to determin that is altogether different, if they feel they need a little help to win then they'll have to live with it. |
![]() David Lythgoe[FORUM MODERATOR]Handicap : 2 Reply : Mon 30th Aug 2010 23:50 |
Most good Golfers play the game with slight negative thoughts. "Which side is the best to miss on?" If short is in Water, right and left is deep rough and sand but over the back is a Stand and a Drop Zone 10ft off the Putting Surface, any Golfer will Err on being big. It doesn't mean they will aim at the Stand but that is their 'Get Out' area. Some people think that playing the 18th hole at an Open Championship is one of the hardest things to play. NO it isn't. Apart from places like Troon and St Andrews where over the Green is Out of Bounds, you just aim it down the funnel between the Stands. If you miss and end up in, over or under them it is a drop about 20ft off the Green. Really takes the pressure off that second shot. TheLyth |
![]() Colin CooteHandicap : 20.1 Reply : Tue 31st Aug 2010 08:08 |
Any golfer can play to any part of the course and use it to his own advantage. if obstructions are deliberately erected on the course no matter where then it is irrelevant as to whether a playing actually attempts to put it where he may get free relief, it is all a part of the course, if a golfer deliberately hits the ball against a wall or obstruction that is actually OOB in the attempt to rebound and get closer to the hole, that is good play. I would only say that it is if a player plays a shot that is reckless and likely to cause injury to spectators or players etc. then that becomes unsporting and unethical. You play the course as you see it, and you play to win. you take whatever advantage comes your way |
![]() John FloodHandicap : 11.9 Reply : Tue 31st Aug 2010 09:01 |
| I watched this in real time & it was his caddie that suggested playing for the back of the green as the tent was there & they knew they would get a free drop. The commentators which included Faldo & Butch Harmon said it was great thinking under pressure & showed creative thinking. Most rules in golf are devised to help & we see it week in week out where pro's use them to their advantage. This was no different. |
| Previous Post:I will always remember the day I broke 90 ........ | Next Post: Warwickshire golf courses. |
| Post reply : |
Golfshake Features
Popular News Features
- Slow Play feature: Kwik Golf
- Slow Play Weekly Feature – Golfing Legis
- Feature Interview: Gary Boyd
- Weekly Tour Wrap-Up: 6th Feb 2012
- Laura Davies and Melissa Reid ready for
- Skycaddie SGXw Close Up
- Omega Dubai Desert Classic Preview & Pic
- Golfbuddy Launches a Talking GPS Rangefi
- Golf Live Announce Attendance of Gary Pl
- Places for Craw’s Nest Tassie Gone in 60
Bookmark this page:
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Facebook
reddit
- Slow Play Weekly Feature – Golfing Legislation
- Tiger Woods Looks for Returned Success at AT&T Pebble Beach Pro Am
- Skycaddie SGXw Close Up
- Golf Tourism Industry Seminars go Global
- Le Touessrok Partners With Victor Dubuisson


















